Актуальные вопросы тюркологических исследований

37 Международная научная конференция XIX Ивановские чтения The most common definition of this category in grammar is the following, the voice of a verb, also called diathesis and (rarely) the gender of a verb, describes the relationship between the action that the verb expresses and the participants identified by its arguments (subject, object, etc.). (https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voice ) In Turkic linguistics in this category paid a lot of attention. In the Turkic languages, unlike Indo-European this category is very developed and has more forms, among which reflexive, reciprocal, causative and passive. All these forms are used much more often in speech than voice’s forms in European languages. We can say that in European languages there are only two forms: the active voice the passive voice, in some languages it is possible to meet also the middle voice. Therefore, we cannot say that in Western linguistics, this concept was well designed. According to the author, the category of the Voice is the inflectional category, in the meaning of each of the forms which is reflected in and reinforced one of the varieties of relations between actions and one of its arguments. [3.С. 53]. However, important to understand the functioning of this category in the speech is the determination of which argument is associated with the action, its subject or its object. In the Turkic linguistic tradition can meet supporters of the viewpoint that the Voice expresses the attitude between the action and its subject , [7. С. 454 ]. There is also an opinion that the connection occurs between the action and its subject or its object [1. С. 333]. Nevertheless, the actual material of different Turkic languages, and long- term studies of this topic are increasingly pushing the author to the conclusion, the Voice as a grammatical category indicates the relationship of the action only with its subject. Thus, each form reports information about a particular variety of relationship that occurs between the action and the object that is perceived as its grammatical subject [4]. This article examines the use of causative in the Yakut language is to confirm the preceding hypothesis. Already O.N. Betling noted a large number of affixes, by which causatives are formed in the Yakut language [2. C. 315]: -т, -тар, -ар и -ыар. The use of causative in the Yakut speech demonstrates not only the diversity of formal indicators, but they transmit a variety of meanings, some of these meanings I would like to elaborate, since they are able to reinforce the idea ,which were discussed above.